It is my intention to copy the pdf as text into wikisource, then add headings so that the relevant part can easily be linked from an article or talk page. Dover area school district won a federal court case on behalf of parents of public school children against the school district that had attempted to impose religious beliefs on. Dover brought before the court the question of teaching intelligent design in schools. Dover area school district federal court case sometimes called scopes ii or the dover panda trial by the media. Dover area school district federal court case involving intelligent design and the book of pandas and people kitzmiller v.
The foundation for thought and ethics is the publisher of of pandas and people, the intelligentdesign textbook at the heart of the dover, pennyslvania controversy. Johnny kitzmiller 19041986, american football player and member of the college football hall of fame. Below are links to complete transcripts of testimony at the kitzmiller v. The court found that socalled weaknesses in the theory of evolution had been clearly refuted by scientists and 1 393 u. In december 2004, the aclupa sued the dover area school district on behalf of eleven parents who objected to the recent policy that required the teaching of intelligent design in biology classes as an alternative to evolution. This was the first time in america that any schools at any level had specifically promoted intelligent design. We are all committed to giving you individual attention as we provide personalized oral health care tailored for your unique dental needs and goals. Kitzmiller trial transcripts national center for science. Intelligent design is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to u. Dover case that resulted in the most absurdly hyped court decision in memory. Dover area school district involved a policy under which students will be made aware of gapsproblems in darwins theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design.
The aclu of pennsylvania 2005 in conjunction with americans united in kitzmiller v. Dover area school district federal court case involving intelligent design and the book of pandas and people. The evolution of antievolution policies after kitzmiller v. Where a party takes reasonable steps to protect its interest, its application should not fail on timeliness. Jones iii in his historic decision in kitzmiller v. Dover area school board intelligent design case december 21, 2005 the opinion of the federal court judge in kitzmiller v. The first judicial test for intelligent design philip a.
This file contains additional information such as exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. Since the decision was issued, jones 9page judicial opinion has been lavished with praise as a. Nova intelligent design on trial links and books pbs. Where a party takes reasonable steps to protect its interest, its application should not fail on timeliness grounds. Dover, pennsylvania intelligent design case last update. It said that intelligent design was not science, and could not be taught as science in schools. Darwin in smalltown america is a 2008 book by journalist lauri lebo about the kitzmiller v. World heritage encyclopedia, the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available, and the most definitive collection ever assembled. Dover,1 which declared unconstitutional the reading of a statement about intelligent design id in public school science classrooms in dover, pennsylvania. Dover,a pennsylvania case on intelligent design id, be the end of lawsuits over id or the beginning of a wave. Dover area school board hereafter kitzmiller decision see. Dover area school district trial documents for links to official trial documents, transcripts and. The evolving role of the courts in educational policy. Dover area school district,5 a federal court ruled that ointelligent design, o which sb55 clearly contemplates, is religious and unscientific.
Dec 20, 2005 this file contains additional information such as exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. A comparison of judge jones opinion in kitzmiller v. In response to the subpoenas, counsel for the reporters filed a motion to quash the subpoenas or for protective order. Kitzmiller, dds and his son, andrew kitzmiller, dds work with a fantastic, caring team. Sep 28, 2006 dover, pennsylvania intelligent design case last update. Rearrange individual pages or entire files in the desired order. A school board election was only months away, and now eight of the nine seats would be up for grabs, putting intelligent design on trial in the voting booth as well as the courtroom. The reporters became involved with this litigation when plaintiffs served them with subpoenas and noticed their depositions for june 8, 2005. The latest versions of adobe reader do not support viewing pdf files within firefox on mac os and if you are using a modern intel mac, there is no official plugin for viewing pdf files within the browser window. Dover area school district, in which parents in dover, pa. Dover area school district,1 the dover school board and the intelligentdesign movement as a whole stood trial on the claim that they were trying to pass off a religious view as though it were a scientific theory, so that they could market it to students in publicschool science classrooms. District court for the middle district of pennsylvania is one of the foremost defenders of evolution in public schools, ruling the teaching of intelligent design unconstitutional in public schools in the landmark kitzmiller v. Steven stough, resident of dover, pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the eighth grade in the dover area school district and intends for his child to attend dover high school. There is also a wikipedia article about the case, with a great deal of worthwhile background information.
It is also called the dover trial, because it happened in dover, pennsylvania. Dover area school district decision, in which a federal judge ruled that intelligent design is not science and that teaching the topic in public. This study accordingly examines kitzmiller in light of the interrelated tensions. Dover area school district was a case in pennsylvania challenging the inclusion of a oneminute presentation on intelligent design to precede the evolution curriculum, and the inclusion of of pandas and people in public school libraries. We allege that intelligent design is stealth creationism and, therefore, teaching a religious doctrine in science class violates the establishment. We would like to show you a description here but the site wont allow us. Kitzmiller, washington, an unincorporated community.
Kitzmiller, resident of dover, pennsylvania is a parent of a child in the ninth grade and a child in the eleventh grade at dover high school. Kitzmiller plaintiff s brief intelligent design is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to u. Dover area school district policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design. On january 6, 2005, defendants filed an answer in the abovecaptioned case. Sep 25, 2015 tomorrow marks the tenth anniversary of opening of arguments in the kitzmiller v. In 2005, did an obscure federal judge in dover, pennsylvania, at last settle the ultimate scientific question that has fascinated mankind for millennia. Introduction 1 on october 18, 2004, the dover area school district board of directors passed a. Rutgers journal of law and religion volume 8 fall 2006 kitzmiller v. Plaintiffs shall file with the court and serve on defendants, their claim for damages and a verified statement of any fees andor costs. Leib first learned of a change in the biology curriculum by reading local newspapers. Dover area school district intelligent design trial, through her own perspective as a local reporter on the trial as she confronted her own attitudes about organized religion and her father who was a fundamentalist christian. Dover area school board mischaracterized my role and actions on behalf of discovery institute in matters at issue in the case, making it necessary for me to set the record straight.
Dover area school district won a federal court case on behalf of parents of public school children against the school district that had attempted to impose religious beliefs on those who did not share them. It would become an important test for the constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in public schools. Jones iiis decision barring dover area school district from mentioning intelligent design in a ninthgrade biology class. September 28, 2006 this set of resources is this sites archive for the kitzmiller, et al. Dover area school district and dover area school district board of directors collectively defendants or dasd, in the united states district court for the middle district of pennsylvania. Behes response to kitzmiller 2 introduction on december 20, 2005 judge john jones issued his opinion in the matter of kitzmiller, in which i was the lead witness for the defense. Kitzmiller plaintiffs brief intelligent design is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to u.
Does teaching intelligent design in biology classes violate the us constitution. The courts website with the 9 page opinion pdf file is here. Darwinian evolution is accepted by the great majority of scientists as the method by which the diversity of earths organisms, including humans. They reveal that the entire community has con sistently and unwaveringly understood the controversy to concern whether a religious view should be taught as science in the dover public school system. Kitzmiller treats smiles and so much more for his neighbors in cincinnati, milford and loveland oh. Pursuant to the policy, the school district drafted a disclaimer that teachers were required to read in class prior to teaching evolution.
1143 1085 1202 818 958 811 429 739 799 659 1056 1490 1018 1365 941 665 546 1455 266 703 460 646 99 1394 1386 34 1251 408 390 134 935 78 82 449 86 1409